Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mahadevan HUF Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Appeal Number : ITA No.: 997/CHNY/2017
Date of Judgement/Order : 15/06/2022
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Mahadevan HUF Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)

We noted that the individual Smt. Bhavani Mahadevan had purchased the land at Plot No.94, ARN Nagar, Korattur by way of sale deed dated 14.07.1994 and land at Plot No.II, VGN Avenue, Sennerkuppam Village by way of sale deed dated 03.08.1995. Shri R. Mahadevan had purchased the land at Plot No.1, VGN Avenue, Sennerkuppam Village by way of sale deed dated 09.10.1995. During the course of hearing now, on query from the Bench, the ld.counsel for the assessee could not file any detail before us, what is the nucleus of the HUF during the period i.e., financial year 1994-95 & 1995-96. The Bench subsequently asked the following details:-

(i) The proof that the assessee has obtained loans in the name of HUF.

(ii) Any bank account of HUF where assessee has parked the loan funds or

(iii) The HUF has any nucleus fund available with it from where the investment is made.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031