F. No. 312/109/2015-OT
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Direct Taxes
Room No. 281, Hotel Samrat
Kautilya Marg, Chanakya Puri
New Delhi – 110021
Telefax : 011-24101573
Mail – [email protected]
New Delhi, 29th January 2016
OFFICE MEMORANDUM
Sub : Issue of refunds – procedure to be followed in other cases where notice under Section 245 has been issued for ITRs processed in F.Y. 15-16-regarding
I am directed to refer to the Board O.M. of even number dated 14th January 2016 regarding issue of refunds upto ₹ 5000/-, and refunds in cases where outstanding arrears are upt ₹ 5000/-, without any adjustment of outstanding arrears.
2. In this regard, I am further directed to convey the decision of the Board that following procedure is to be adopted in other cases, which are not covered by the aforementioned relaxation, and where notice under Section 245 has been issued to the taxpayer : –
a) In cases where that tax payer has contested the demand, CPC would issue a reminder to the jurisdictional Assessing Officers about the contention of the taxpayer, asking them to either confirm, or make appropriate changes, to the demand, within thirty days. In case no response is received from the jurisdictional Assessing Officer, within the stipulated period of thirty days, CPC would issue the refund without any adjustment. The responsibility of non-adjustment of refund against outstanding arrears, if any, would lie with the Assessing Officer.
b) In cases where there is no response from the taxpayer, CPC would issue a reminder to the taxpayer, asking to either agree or disagree with the demand, and submit response on the e-filling portal, within thirty days. In case no response is received from the taxpayer, within the stipulated period of thirty day, CPC would adjust the demand, along with applicable interest u/s 220(2), against the refund due and issue the balance refund, if any, to the taxpayer.
3. In view of above, it is requested that all Assessing Officers in your region may kindly be directed to follow the aforementioned procedure in respect of pending refund cases, not covered by the earlier OM dated 14th January 2016.
4. This issues with the approval of Chairman, CBDT.
Yours faithfully,
(Salil Mishra)
Director (OT&WT)
All Principal Chief Commissioners of Income Tax
Copy to : –
1. All Members of the Board for kind information
2. The Pr. Director General of Income Tax (Systems)
3. Database Cell for placing the O.M. on the website.
(Salil Mishra)
Director (OT&WT)
My refund amount for AY 2021-22 for my HUF is Rs. 53479 only as intimated by notice under Sec 143(1). Out of this Rs. 40550 only has been adjusted against demand for AY 2019. This demand had not been agreed to by me and in the absence of repinse within a reasonable period I had sent a grievance on line. Acknowledgement no. of this grievance is – 1443884. The grievance remains unaddfessed to date. I feel thr adjustment is onwarranted as advance tax paid by me amounting to Rs. 30000 had been igonred by the IT department in return for AY 2019. What options do I have to seek reversal of adjustment?
Why the cap of Rs. 5,000/-.?
What about rectifications pending at CPC ?? CPC has not been giving credit for the brought forward TDS which was duly reflected in ITR and 26AS of earlier AY.