Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pr. CIT Vs Dishman Pharmaceuticals And Chemicals Ltd (Gujarat High Court)
Related Assessment Year : 2006-07
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
PCIT Vs Dishman Pharmaceuticals And Chemicals Ltd (Gujarat High Court) Conclusion: Once the prior period income was held to be taxable, the prior period expenditure also should be allowed to be set off and assessee was not obliged in law to indicate any direct or indirect nexus between the prior period income and prior period expenditure. Held: AO found that assessee credited net period income i.e. prior period income minus prior period expenses. AO took the view that during the year under consideration the “prior period income” was taxable, but the “prior period expenses” were not al...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

2 Comments

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031