Case Law Details
Case Name : Pr. CIT Vs Dishman Pharmaceuticals And Chemicals Ltd (Gujarat High Court)
Related Assessment Year : 2006-07
Courts :
All High Courts Gujarat High Court
Become a Premium member to Download.
If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
PCIT Vs Dishman Pharmaceuticals And Chemicals Ltd (Gujarat High Court)
Conclusion: Once the prior period income was held to be taxable, the prior period expenditure also should be allowed to be set off and assessee was not obliged in law to indicate any direct or indirect nexus between the prior period income and prior period expenditure.
Held: AO found that assessee credited net period income i.e. prior period income minus prior period expenses. AO took the view that during the year under consideration the “prior period income” was taxable, but the “prior period expenses” were not al...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Kindly Refer to
Privacy Policy &
Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.
Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.
2 Comments
Cancel reply
This judgement is incorrect.. Sec.37 allows expenditure of current period only and not earlier prior period..