Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vijay Kumar Patil Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Vijay Kumar Patil Vs ITO (ITAT Hyderabad) No Cure for Jurisdictional Defect: Post-29.03.2022 s.148 Only by FAO- ITAT Hyderabad Quashes Reassessment: JAO Lacked Jurisdiction to Issue s.148 Notice Post-Faceless Regime Hyderabad ITAT ‘A’ Bench, in Shri Vijay Kumar Patil vs. ITO  (ITA No.1328/Hyd/2025, AY 2017-18, order dated 24.12.2025), allowed the assessee’s appeal on a pure jurisdictional ground and quashed the entire reassessment. The Tribunal held that the order u/s 148A(d) dated 27.03.2024 and notice u/s 148 dated 28.03.2024 were issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO), ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031