Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mihir Madhavrao Suryawanshi Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Mihir Madhavrao Suryawanshi Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)

Impugned Section 271(c) penalty has arisen in consequence to the lower authorities action disallowing the assessee’s section 54F deduction claim. And in assessee’s quantum appeal ITAT has already deleted the foregoing 54F disallowance and therefore, penalty in issue herein has no legs to stands as a necessary corollary.

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT PUNE

This assessee’s appeal for AY 2013-14 arises against the CIT(A)-1, Pu

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31