Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ratnaram Kohlaram Chaudhary Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ratnaram Kohlaram Chaudhary Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed in reassessment proceedings where AO treated certain purchases as bogus based on Sales Tax Department information and estimated profit element at 25%/12.5%, which was later reduced by CIT(A) to 6.5%/6%. Tribunal observed that additions were purely on estimated profit basis and not on concrete proof of concealment. Relying on jurisdictional Bombay HC decision in Pr.CIT vs Colo Colour Pvt Ltd and settled law, ITAT held that when income is determined on ad-hoc estimation or guesswork, it cannot automatically lead t...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031