Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ratnaram Kohlaram Chaudhary Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2009-10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ratnaram Kohlaram Chaudhary Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed in reassessment proceedings where AO treated certain purchases as bogus based on Sales Tax Department information and estimated profit element at 25%/12.5%, which was later reduced by CIT(A) to 6.5%/6%. Tribunal observed that additions were purely on estimated profit basis and not on concrete proof of concealment. Relying on jurisdictional Bombay HC decision in Pr.CIT vs Colo Colour Pvt Ltd and settled law, ITAT held that when income is determined on ad-hoc estimation or guesswork, it cannot automatically lead t...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Sec 13(1)(c) Not Attracted for Higher Profit to Related Concerns: HC Karnataka HC Quashes TDS Refund on Land Acquisition Over Suppression; ₹5L Cost Assessment Order Passed in Name of Deceased Assessee Held Void – Karnataka HC LTCG Cannot Be Taxed in Wife’s Hands When Property Settled by Husband – ITAT Deletes Rs. 19.86 Cr Addition Reopening Notice Invalid Without Proper Section u/s 151 – ITAT Quashes Reassessment View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031