Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Prateek Rahul Mehta Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Prateek Rahul Mehta Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Mumbai ITAT deleted an addition of ₹16.61 lakh made u/s 69C towards alleged unexplained credit card payments. The Tribunal observed: The case was reopened based on AIR information of high credit card usage The assessee explained that the card was used by relatives and associated entities, who directly made payments Detailed documentary evidence was furnished, including: Confirmations Bank statements ITRs and financials of contributors Affidavits supporting transactions The ITAT held: The assessee had fully explained the source of payments Paymen...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

ITAT Restores Section 80P Deduction Claim of Agricultural Credit Co-op Society Missing Safety Certificates Justified Section 12AB Registration Rejection: Bengaluru ITAT Absence of Irrevocability Clause Alone No Ground to Deny Section 12AB Registration: ITAT Mumbai Sections 234B & 234C Interest Excluded from Tax Effect for Appeal Limit: ITAT Mumbai Earlier Loan Repayment via Bank Not Taxable Under Section 68: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031