Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Ravindar Shankar Sawant (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Ravindar Shankar Sawant (ITAT Mumbai) Mumbai ITAT upheld deletion of penalty u/s 271(1)(c), holding that once the underlying quantum additions are deleted, penalty automatically fails. The Tribunal noted: Penalty of ₹61.06 lakh was levied based on additions u/s 68 and 69C The ITAT had already deleted the quantum additions in earlier proceedings Revenue also conceded this factual position The ITAT held: Penalty is dependent on quantum addition Once the foundation (addition) is removed, penalty cannot stand Penalty becomes infructuous and non-est Accordingly: Deletion of penalty b...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Benami Veil Cannot Be Lifted by Clever Drafting: SC Restores Rejection of Plaint at Threshold Specific Performance Decree Does Not Die Automatically: SC Revives Execution Despite Delay in Deposit IBC Is Not a Recovery Shortcut: SC Rejects CIRP in Builder-Bank-Borrower Dispute No Signature, Yet Bound by Arbitration: SC Allows Collaborator to Invoke Arbitration Clause Entire Bank Deposits Cannot Be Taxed as Income – ITAT Restricts Addition to 2% in Renukamata Society Cases View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031