Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shri Chimanlal Manilal Patel Vs. ACIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Appeal Number : ITA No.508/Ahd/2010
Date of Judgement/Order : 22/06/2012
Related Assessment Year : 2006-2007
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

It is a fact that the addition has been made by the AO in the revisionary proceedings. The addition has been made on the basis of provisions of section 50C. It is not the case of the AO that the assessee has received consideration over and above than that declared in the sales deed. The AO has not disputed the consid

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. R. Ramamurthy says:

    Levy of tax itself is on presumption that the market value of the property is more than what is stated in the sale deed and not on the ground that the assessee /vendor has received more consideration than what is stated in the document and penalties are levied on presumptions of income and expecting all the citiznes to pay penalties also on presumptions of incomes, then there is no need for this big voluminous, not possible to understand by a common man, waste of money and presume every man who have money to pay tax and interest and penalties and collect, there solves all the problems.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
October 2024
M T W T F S S
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031