Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : DCIT Vs Central Bank of India (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
DCIT Vs Central Bank of India (ITAT Mumbai) Mumbai ITAT Confirms Deletion of ₹305.49 Cr Penalty—MAT u/s 115JB Not Applicable to Nationalised Banks: Mumbai   Tribunal   dealt with Revenue’s challenge against deletion of a massive penalty of ₹305,49,63,285/- levied u/s 271(1)(c). The penalty was based on  AO’s treatment of bad debts written off of ₹14,31,45,93,495/- in the computation of book profit u/s 115JB (MAT). CIT(A) had deleted the penalty relying on the Tribunal’s Special Bench ruling in Union Bank of India (ITA 3740/Mum/2018, order dated 06-09-2024), which held that M...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031