Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Abdulwahid Abdulkarim Qureshi Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2016-17
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Abdulwahid Abdulkarim Qureshi Vs ITO (ITAT Pune)

Penalty Cannot Survive Without Quantum Addition: Section 271(1)(c) Levy Deleted

The Pune Bench of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) deleted the penalty of ₹47.94 lakh levied under section 271(1)(c), holding that once the underlying quantum addition itself is deleted, the penalty has n

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

840-Day Appeal Delay Not Condoned; Blaming CA Not Sufficient Cause: ITAT Bangalore Educational Society Cannot Be Treated as Religious Trust Without Evidence: ITAT Bangalore Sec 270A Penalty: Immunity U/s 270AA Cannot Be Denied Without Hearing – ITAT Bangalore ITAT Bangalore Deletes Sec 69A Addition on Demonetisation Cash Deposits Explained by Earlier Withdrawals Sec 68 Addition on Opening Loans Deleted; Interest & Salary Allowed – ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
March 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031