Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Canara Bank Vs The Income Tax Officer(TDS) (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2006- 07 & 2009- 10
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

The provisions of Penalty levied u/s 272B of Income Tax Act, 1961 are prospective i.e. it is applicable from the date of insertion of sub-clause (iv) to section 139A(5B) of the Act i.e. 01.06.2006.

Held:

The assessee had filed e-TDS quarterly statement on 31.8.2005, in which PAN numbers of 19 deductees were found to be invalid and consequently the Assessing Officer levied penalty at Rs.1,19,000/- under section 272B of

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31