Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Sukhdev Singh Vs The JCIT(TDS) (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Facts of the case- In this case it was informed that the assessee has not deducted the tax at source as required under the provisions of  Chapter XVII-B of the Income Tax Act. The Assessing Officer levied penalty under section 271C of the Income Tax Act for a sum of Rs.40,254/- vide separate order. The assessee submitted before the learned CIT (Appeals) that he was under bonafide belief that TDS was not to be deducted on payment  made to non-banking financial institution. The assessee relied upon the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

  1. Richa Bareja says:

    Hi,

    I need to pay penalty under section 271C on account of non deduction of TDS. Which challan (280 0r 281) to be used for the payment?

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31