Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pharmanza Herbal Pvt. Ltd Vs PCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pharmanza Herbal Pvt. Ltd Vs PCIT (ITAT Ahmedabad) PCIT Was Right! AO’s “Allow First, Verify Never” Approach Invites 263- Form 3CL is Non-Negotiable – AO Can’t Grant 35(2AB) on Assumptions, 263 Sustained AO Allowed R&D Deduction Without Verifying Form 3CL – ITAT Confirms 263 as AO Ignored Mandatory Law! Assessee Company filed its return declaring income of ₹4.81 Cr. AO completed scrutiny assessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 143(3A) & 143(3B) accepting returned income. During assessment, AO allowed deduction of ₹1,80,11,055 u/s 35(2AB), being 150% of in-house R&D expenditure...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031