Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Smt. Shantha Natarajan Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-2014
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Smt. Shantha Natarajan Vs DCIT (ITAT Hyderabad) ITAT Hyderabad held that statement of a third party already recorded u/s 132(4) of the Income Tax Act cannot be considered as an incriminating document for the purpose of making the addition u/s 153A of the Income Tax Act. Facts- A search and seizure operation u/s 132 of the Act was carried out in the residential premises of the assessee on 25.09.2014. Accordingly, notice u/s 153A of the Act was issued to the assessee on 14.09.2016. In response thereto, assessee filed his return of income for A.Y. 2013-14 on 20.10.2016. Thereafter, the Assessing ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031