Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : PCIT Vs Anand Kumar Jain (HUF) (Delhi High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
PCIT Vs Anand Kumar Jain (HUF) (Delhi High Court) Section 153A Invalid Where Statement Belonging And Pertaining To Person Other Than Searched Person Used To Assume Jurisdiction and Only Section 153C Can Be Invoked And Without Cross Examination Of Witness There Can Be No Valid Proceedings Under Law.    The preliminary question under consideration before us is whether a statement under Section 132(4) constitutes incriminating material for carrying out assessment under S. 153(A) of the Act. A reading of the impugned order reveals that the statement of Mr. Jindal recorded under Section 132(4) fo...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

Mr.Kapil Goel B.Com(H) FCA LLB, Advocate Delhi High Court advocatekapilgoel@gmail.com, 9910272804 Mr Goel is a bachelor of commerce from Delhi University (2003) and is a Law Graduate from Merrut University (2006) and Fellow member of ICAI (Nov 2004). At present, he is practicing as an Advocate View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Bombay HC Quashed Section 153C Proceedings Due to Delay in Recording Satisfaction Note Special Income Tax Audit Invalid Due to Lack of Proven Complexity in Accounts: Delhi HC Assessment Quashed for Failure to Issue Mandatory Show Cause Notice Reassessment Under Section 147 Invalid When Based on Search Findings Mechanical Approval with Vague and Scanty Reasons is invalid: ITAT Kolkata View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930