This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Order to bank to pay 50% of assessee’s huge demand is not justified when appeal is pending before CIT (A)
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Bikram Singh Vs DCIT (Delhi High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Delhi High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Issue before court:
Whether revenue is right in passing order giving instruction to bank to pay 50% of the demand raised against assessee when appeal against the assessment order was pending before CIT (A).
Brief facts:
Assessment of the Petitioner for the AY 2011-12 was completed at Rs. 4,39,71,545/-. Whilst doing so the AO added a sum of Rs.3,25,50,000/- under Section 68 of the Act, after holding that the explanation furnished by the assessee was unacceptable.
The assessee/writ petitioner preferred an appeal to the CIT (A) on 07.04.2014, which is pending.
During the pendency of the appeal...
