Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Miteshkumar Dayaljibhai Pabari Vs ACIT (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Miteshkumar Dayaljibhai Pabari Vs ACIT (ITAT Rajkot)

The assessee, an NRI based in the USA, faced addition of ₹78.69 lakh as unexplained investment u/s 69 r.w.s. 115BBE for purchase of an Ahmedabad flat. The AO rejected explanations of foreign savings, parental contribution & housing loan, citing insufficient evidence. The DRP dismissed assessee’s objections solely due to a one-day delay & non-filing of Form 35A.

ITAT observed that such a minor delay should not defeat substantive justice & that the assessee was denied proper opportunity both before AO & D

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728