Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Miteshkumar Dayaljibhai Pabari Vs ACIT (ITAT Rajkot)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Miteshkumar Dayaljibhai Pabari Vs ACIT (ITAT Rajkot)

The assessee, an NRI based in the USA, faced addition of ₹78.69 lakh as unexplained investment u/s 69 r.w.s. 115BBE for purchase of an Ahmedabad flat. The AO rejected explanations of foreign savings, parental contribution & housing loan, citing insufficient evidence. The DRP dismissed assessee’s objections solely due to a one-day delay & non-filing of Form 35A.

ITAT observed that such a minor delay should not defeat substantive justice & that the assessee was denied proper opportunity both before AO & D

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Six Years of Reassessments Remanded for De-Novo Consideration NRI Cash Gift Addition Under Section 68 Remanded by ITAT Chennai No Further Section 14A Disallowance After Reasoned Suo-Motu Adjustment ITAT Hyderabad quashes final TP assessment as time-barred despite DRP directions Delay in Filing Appeals Condoned Despite Massive Additions and Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031