Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Vipul Mittal Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Vipul Mittal Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)

ITAT Delhi held that notice under section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act issued by ITO, who didn’t have jurisdiction over the assessee, instead of DCIT is unwarranted. Thus, assessment order based on invalid notice is not sustainable.

Facts- During assessment proceedings, AO noticed that the assessee has transacted with the scrip of Turbotech Engineering Ltd. (TTE) and observed that the relevant scrip is one of the various scrips which were involved in generation of fictitious long term capital gain.

AO treated the TT

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728