Sponsored

s 147 is invalid, even if return is filed late

CA Prarthana Jalan 13 Nov 2014 4,574 Views 0 comment Print Income Tax | Judiciary

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shri G.N.Mohan Raju, Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)

Appeal Number : ITA No.242 & 243(Bang) 2013

Date of Judgement/Order : 10/10/2014

Related Assessment Year :

Courts : All ITAT ITAT Bangalore

Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.

Sponsored

CA Prarthana Jalan

Hon’ble Bangalore ITAT has in the case of Shri G.N.Mohan Raju,v/s ITO in ITA No.242 & 243(Bang) 2013 has held that notice u/s 143(2) issued prior to filing of return in response to notice u/s 147 i

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Tags:

Kindly Refer to Privacy Policy & Complete Terms of Use and Disclaimer.

Author Bio

Name: CA Prarthana Jalan

Qualification: CA in Practice

Company: N/A

Location: Uttar Pradesh, IN

Member Since: 28 May 2018 | Total Posts: 134

View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Landmark SC Judgment on TOLA & for 90000 Income Tax Reassessment cases Guidelines for Condonation of Delay in Income Tax Refund Claims Bombay HC imposes a penalty on JAO & CCIT for disregarding a prior judgment Issuance & service of section 143(2) notice after filing of ROI is sine-qua-non for framing assessment PAN-Aadhaar Linkage failure: Higher TDS/TCS Exemption for Deceased Deductees View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

0 Comments

Atul says:

Dear Sir,

We have not received email from you after 13th Nov. 2014.

Please send email on daily basis for latest news & updates.

Thank you.

Regards
ATUL

Reply

November 27, 2014 at 10:09 am
Manish Sachdeva says:

Department is such a dumb place to work at.

Reply

November 16, 2014 at 2:15 pm