This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
No Section 271AAB penalty In absence of mechanism to report investment in tax return
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Gauri Shankar Kandoi Vs DCIT (ITAT Jaipur)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2013-14
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Jaipur
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Gauri Shankar Kandoi Vs DCIT (ITAT Jaipur)
Given that the assessee is a salaried person who is not required to maintain any books of accounts and there is no mechanism to report the investment in the tax return, the said investment cannot be held as undisclosed investment and more so, undisclosed income so defined in section 271AAB of the Act. In light of the same, the investment of Rs. 17,16,594/- so found in purchase of Villa at Suncity Township at Sikar Road, Jaipur cannot be termed as undisclosed income within the meaning of “undisclosed income” as so defined u/s 271 AAB of the Act and...
