In the instant case, what has emerged is that the Assessee, having realised that the expenditure claimed towards travelling under Section 57 of the Act was not tenable, offered the amounts expended to be added to her income and, accordingly, paid the requisite tax and interest upon the same. In our opinion, this was not a case, where, the Assessee could be said to have either concealed particulars or furnished inaccurate particulars of her income.
. It was, essentially, a case, where, an untenable claim for deduction of travel expenditure under Section 57 of the Act had been made and that too based on the advise of a professional, i.e., an Accountant.
EXTRACT OF THE JUDGMENT
1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.
T.C.(A)Nos.139 to 141 of 2017:
2. These appeals are preferred by the Revenue as against the common order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (in short ‘the Tribunal’), dated 19.06.2015.
3. By virtue of the impugned judgment, a common order was passed qua Assessment Years (A.Y.s) 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11.





