No Deemed Dividend if Assessee was not a Shareholder when amount been advanced

ACIT Vs M/s. Bhaawani Shankar Ginning Factory (ITAT Pune)

 The issue in the present ground is with respect to addition u/s 2(22)(e) of the Act. It is an undisputed fact that assessee had received loan from Mahesh Ginning Pvt. Ltd., in which both the partners of the assessee also held 18.19% shares each. We find that Ld.CIT(A) while deciding the issue in favour of the assessee has given a finding that the chief ingredient of Sec.2(22)(e) of the Act is that one should be a shareholder on the date on which the advance was made

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.