Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Indu Maheshwari Vs Circle 19(1) (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Indu Maheshwari Vs Circle 19(1) (ITAT Mumbai) Mutual Fund Dividend Is Fully Exempt u/s 10(35): CPC Can’t Apply Section 115BBDA Due to Return-Form Constraints, Holds ITAT Mumbai The Mumbai ITAT “C” Bench allowed the appeal of Indu Maheshwari (ITA No. 715/Mum/2025, AY 2017-18), holding that dividend income earned from mutual funds is wholly exempt u/s 10(35) and cannot be subjected to tax u/s 115BBDA, merely because the return form lacked a separate disclosure column and the CPC mechanically treated it as dividend from domestic companies The Assessee had disclosed dividend income from mutu...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031