Advertisement
Advertisement
Skip to content
Follow Us on
Advertisement
TOP STORIES
Income Tax

Mere Suspicion Not Enough: ITAT Deletes LTCG Addition on Kushal Tradelink Shares for Lack of Concrete Proof

Case Law Details

TaxGuru Citation
2025 taxguru.in 9412
Case Name
Sana Md. Saqib Puthawala Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)
Date of Judgement/Order
Only available for paid members
Related Assessment Year
2018-19
Advertisement

Sana Md. Saqib Puthawala Vs ITO (ITAT Ahmedabad)

ITAT Ahmedabad deletes addition on alleged bogus LTCG in Kushal Tradelink shares – No live link, no evidence, mere suspicion cannot justify tax

Assessee had declared LTCG of ₹23,02,040 on sale of shares of Kushal Tradelink Ltd and claimed exemption u/s 10(38). Assessment was reopened u/s 147 based only on Insight Portal information alleging accommodation entries in Kushal Group. AO denied exemption, treated entire gain of ₹23,59,580 as unexplained income & added 6% commission ₹1,41,575 u/s 69C. CIT(A) upheld the additions.

Assessee’s contention:

  • Reopening based on “borrowed satisfaction” without independent application of mind.
  • All documents such as demat, contract notes, bank statements, STT-paid transactions, were filed.
  • No material/statements were given to assessee, no cross-examination.
  • Relied on Gujarat HC in Ashishbhai Jashwantbhai Desai HUF (07.01.2025).

Tribunal’s Findings:

Reopening invalid in substance

  • AO relied only on Insight Portal info without showing live link or independent satisfaction.
  • Gujarat HC in Ashishbhai Desai HUF held such reopening is borrowed satisfaction.

 No evidence of assessee’s involvement in price rigging or accommodation entry

  • Merely because there was price rigging in Kushal Tradelink does not mean every investor is a beneficiary.
  • No broker link or statement produced.
  • No cash trail, no off-market deals.

 Genuine transactions established by assessee

  • Shares purchased through SEBI registered broker.
  • Payments through bank, reflected in demat.
  • Regular investor, not one-off transaction.
  • AO did not point out any defect in documents.

 Revenue failed to rebut evidence

  • Once assessee discharged onus, burden shifted to Revenue.
  • Revenue brought no contrary material.

 Addition based on suspicion & general allegation

  • AO made addition on presumption, conjecture & general investigation report.
  • Such addition cannot stand without concrete evidence.

Conclusion of Tribunal:

  • LTCG addition of ₹23,59,580 deleted.
  • Commission addition of ₹1,41,575 u/s 69C also deleted.
  • Entire assessment addition unsustainable in law & facts.

FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF ITAT AHMEDABAD

Paid content

Become a Premium Member, or log in if you are already a Premium member.

Advertisement

Author Info

CA Vijayakumar Shetty
Qualification: CA in Practice
Company: Shetty & Co, Chartered Accountants, Mangalore
Location: Mangalore, Karnataka
Articles Published: 6,879

Join TaxGuru's Network for the latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.