This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
A mere diference is perception of CIT & AO cannot make the order erroneous & prejudicial to the interest or revenue
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Smt. N.K. Vinayak Vs Commissioner of Income Tax (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
CA Prarthana Jalan
We have heard the rival contentions, material available on the record and case laws cited by both the parties. From the facts narrated above and the paper books filed it emerges that during the course of assessment proceeding questions, enquiries and explanation on the relevant issues were called for by the ld AO and were replied by the assessee. Thus these are not the assessments where there was no enquiry on the relevant aspect. The questionnaires, order sheet entries, assessees submissions and explanations make it quite clear. Thus we are unable to hold that assessment ...




