Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Ashok Hirachand Shah Vs Assessing Officer (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Ashok Hirachand Shah Vs Assessing Officer (ITAT Pune) NFAC Can’t Dismiss Appeal for Non-Appearance Without Merits Adjudication: ITAT Pune Restores ₹1.49 Cr 69A Addition Case Pune  ITAT, set aside the order of the CIT(A), NFAC, Delhi, and restored the matter for fresh adjudication on merits. The case arose from a reassessment u/s 147 where the AO made additions aggregating to ₹1.51 crore, including ₹1.49 crore u/s 69A towards alleged unexplained cash deposits in multiple bank accounts, ₹71,048 as estimated business income by applying 2% NP on current-account transactions, and ₹1.54...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031