Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO (TDS) Vs M/s Progressive Civil Engineers Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Revenue raised an appeal against the order of CIT (A) deleting the addition of Rs.35,85,083/- made by the assessing officer. Brief of the case 6 to 8 lines In the Case of Income Tax Officer (TDS) Vs. M/s Progressive Civil Engineers Private Limited,  ITAT Mumbai held that Lease Premium payment made to CIDCO is to acquire capital asset being long term holding rights along with right to construct and therefore it is capital expenditure in nature. Thus, same cannot be treated as rent under the preview of Section 194I of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Facts of the case a. CIDCO (M/s City Industrial Dev...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930