Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO (TDS) Vs M/s Progressive Civil Engineers Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Revenue raised an appeal against the order of CIT (A) deleting the addition of Rs.35,85,083/- made by the assessing officer.

Brief of the case 6 to 8 lines

In the Case of Income Tax Officer (TDS) Vs. M/s Progressive Civil Engineers Private Limited,  ITAT Mumbai held that Lease Premium payment made to CIDCO is to acquire capital asset being long term holding rights along with right to construct and therefore it is capital expenditure in nature. Thus, same cannot be treated as rent under the preview of Section 194I of the Income Tax

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31