Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO (TDS) Vs M/s Progressive Civil Engineers Private Limited (ITAT Mumbai)
Appeal Number : ITA Nos.2930/Mum/2014
Date of Judgement/Order : 23/10/2015
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Revenue raised an appeal against the order of CIT (A) deleting the addition of Rs.35,85,083/- made by the assessing officer.

Brief of the case 6 to 8 lines

In the Case of Income Tax Officer (TDS) Vs. M/s Progressive Civil Engineers Private Limited,  ITAT Mumbai held that Lease Premium payment made to CIDCO is to acquire capital asset being long term holding rights along with right to construct and therefore it is capital expenditure in nature. Thus, same cannot be treated as rent under the preview of Section 194I of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Facts of the case

a. CIDCO (M/s City Industrial Development Corporation) allotted a plot No. 166 in sector 27 of Belapuron on 5.5.2009 under the provision or rules prevailing in the state for a period of 60 years. During the assessment year 2010-11, company paid a sum of Rs. 1,38,12,158/- to CIDCO as Lease Premium.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031