Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : CIT Vs Birla Corporation Limited (Calcutta High Court)
Appeal Number : ITA No.526 of 2004
Date of Judgement/Order : 02/02/2016
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Brief of the case is to be sorted properly

Brief of the case:

  • The High Court held that the amount paid was held by the Government till a direction was issued by the appellate authority to refund the same, therefore, it should carry interest as a matter of course. Furthermore, it was held that interest was in the nature of compensation for use and retention of money collected unauthorisedly by the department.
  • The High Court further held that refund due and payable to the assessee is debt owed and payable by the revenue. Furthermore, it was held that merely because there is no express statutory provision for payment of interest on refund of excess amount collected by the Revenue, the Government cannot evade its obligation to refund the money with accrued interest for the period of undue retention
  • Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031