Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Balaguru Rajamanickam Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Balaguru Rajamanickam Vs ITO (ITAT Chennai) Late by Days, Lost for Years: Time-Barred 148 Notice Quashed- Wrong Clock & Wrong Officer: Double Knock-Out for Revenue In Balaguru Rajamanickam Vs. ITO 9ITA Nos.2827 & 2828/Chny/2025, AYs 2015-16 & 2016-17, order dated 31.12.2025, Chennai ITAT allowed both appeals & quashed reassessments on jurisdictional grounds. For AY 2015-16, Assessee had not filed return & AO reopened assessment alleging unexplained cash deposits & credits. Tribunal held that notice u/s 148 dated 26.04.2022 was time-barred, as limitation under 1st provis...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend 870-Day Delay Not Condoned: ITAT Refuses Relief, Calls Out Negligence & “No Sufficient Cause” Wrong Section Claim Not Fatal: ITAT Remands Matter & Nullifies Penalty Penalty U/s 270A Quashed: No Specific Charge of “Misreporting” = No Penalty View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031