Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Tankeshwar Gohil Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Tankeshwar Gohil Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) ₹1.50 Crore Demonetisation Deposit Partly Sustained – ITAT Restricts Addition to ₹5 Lakh & Rules 115BBE Inapplicable for Pre-April 2017 Transactions Assessee, engaged in money transfer business through Oxygen Services India Pvt. Ltd., had deposited ₹1.50 crore in cash during demonetisation. AO treated the amount as unexplained money u/s 69A, taxed u/s 115BBE, & CIT(A) upheld the same. Before Tribunal, Assessee furnished a detailed paper book of 517 pages, containing records of customer transactions & business activities, contending that ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930