Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Indo Plastic Co. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2020-21
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Indo Plastic Co. Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) Addition on Alleged Inflated Purchases Based Solely on Third-party Data Deleted – No Independent Enquiry or Evidence Found Against Assessee Assessee, a partnership firm engaged in manufacturing automobile components, was assessed u/s 147 based on information from search on M/s Bharat Seats Ltd. (BSL) & M/s Sharda Motor Industries Ltd. (SMIL), where it was alleged that these companies suppressed profits by inflating purchases & returning cash. AO alleged that the Assessee inflated purchases of ₹31.35 lakh (3% of total ₹10.45 crore) & added...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930