ITAT Sends ₹34.82 Lakh Bogus Purchase Case Back to CIT(A) for Fresh Hearing

Surinder Kumar Chhabra Vs ACIT (ITAT Delhi) ITAT Delhi remands case – ₹34.82 lakh alleged bogus purchases to be re-examined; CIT(A)’s non-speaking order set aside; Non-Speaking Order Set Aside – ITAT Remands Bogus Purchase Addition for Fresh Review; ITAT: Right to Cross-Examination Vital in Bogus Purchase Allegations; eopening Upheld, But Addition Needs Re-Examination – ITAT Finds CIT(A) Order Non-Speaking Assessee appealed against the order of NFAC, Delhi (CIT(A)) confirming addition of ₹34,82,667 as unexplained expenditure u/s 69C. AO had reopened assessment u/s 147 based on Inve...