This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
In absence of Evidence Proving Creditworthiness of Creditors additions justified
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Nitin Madhukar Rathi Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2013-14
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
Nitin Madhukar Rathi Vs DCIT (ITAT Pune)
Introduction: The case of Nitin Madhukar Rathi vs. DCIT, heard at ITAT Pune, revolves around the assessment of unexplained cash deposits arising from unsecured loans. The Assessing Officer (AO) raised concerns about the credibility and regular income source of certain creditors, resulting in an addition of Rs.60,00,000 to the assessee’s total income. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)] provided partial relief, but a significant addition of Rs.38,00,000 was confirmed.
Detailed Analysis: The AO scrutinized unsecured lo...
