Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ITO Vs Ankit Naresh Tulsian (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ITO Vs Ankit Naresh Tulsian (ITAT Pune) Penny Stock Allegation Falls Flat – SEBI Final Report Saves the Day- Reopening on Same Facts = Change of Opinion: ITAT Quashes 148 & Deletes ₹1 Cr Addition Revenue appealed deletion of ₹1,00,08,500 added u/s 69A on the allegation that LTCG from sale of 2,00,000 shares of Mishkafin Finance & Trading Ltd. (MFTL) was bogus. AO relied on SEBI’s interim order alleging price rigging & treated the LTCG exempt u/s 10(38) as unexplained money taxable u/s 115BBE. CIT(A) examined extensive documents—contract notes, demat statements, bank e...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930