Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Snehalatha Singhi Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2012-13
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Snehalatha Singhi Vs DCIT (ITAT Bangalore) In this case, the Bangalore ITAT held that reassessment proceedings initiated under Sections 147/148 are invalid in law where the Assessing Officer fails to dispose of the assessee’s objections by a speaking order, as mandated by the Supreme Court in GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd. The assessee had raised detailed objections to the reopening on 26.12.2019, but the AO considered only one part of the objections and completely ignored the second set filed later the same day. The Tribunal noted  that there was no evidence of disposal of these objections, ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930