Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mohammed Yousuf Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mohammed Yousuf Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) In , the ITAT Bangalore quashed the entire reassessment proceedings, holding that the foundation itself was legally defective due to violation of Sec 148A(b) and breach of limitation u/s 149. The Tribunal noted that the notice issued u/s 148A(b) granted only 5 days for response, whereas the statute mandates a minimum 7 days, making the notice invalid and contrary to law. This procedural lapse was held to be fatal, as it strikes at the root of jurisdiction. Further, the notice u/s 148 was issued on 04.04.2022 for AY 2015-16, whereas the limitation expir...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031