Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mohammed Yousuf Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore)
Related Assessment Year : 2015-16
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download. Already Upgraded? Login here to access.
Mohammed Yousuf Vs ITO (ITAT Bangalore) In , the ITAT Bangalore quashed the entire reassessment proceedings, holding that the foundation itself was legally defective due to violation of Sec 148A(b) and breach of limitation u/s 149. The Tribunal noted that the notice issued u/s 148A(b) granted only 5 days for response, whereas the statute mandates a minimum 7 days, making the notice invalid and contrary to law. This procedural lapse was held to be fatal, as it strikes at the root of jurisdiction. Further, the notice u/s 148 was issued on 04.04.2022 for AY 2015-16, whereas the limitation expir...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Kolkata ITAT Quashes Assessment as Section 143(2) Notice Was Without Jurisdiction BSNL VRS-2019 Ex-gratia Fully Exempt Under Section 10(10B): Surat ITAT Patna ITAT Deletes Search Additions Based on Retracted Statements & Estimates Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031