Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : ACIT Vs Patil Construction and Infrastructure Limited (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
ACIT Vs Patil Construction and Infrastructure Limited (ITAT Pune) ITAT Pune Sends Back 80-IA Claim – Settlement Commission Order Not Blanket Licence for All Projects Patil Construction & Infrastructure Ltd, engaged in civil contracts, claimed deduction u/s 80-IA for infrastructure projects. The AO denied deduction (₹5.6 cr in AY 2013-14) holding the Assessee was only a contractor executing road & runway works, not a “developer”, relying on CBDT Circular 4/2010 & the statutory auditor’s remark that the claim conflicted with the Act. Before CIT(A), the Assessee argued that ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence Section 54F Exemption Allowed on Sale of Redeveloped Flat: ITAT Mumbai View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031