Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Brahm Precision Materials Pvt. Ltd Vs CIT(A) (ITAT Pune)
Related Assessment Year : 2018-19
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Brahm Precision Materials Pvt. Ltd Vs CIT(A) (ITAT Pune) Foreign Venture Flopped, But Not the Tax Claim – ITAT Says Business Loss, Not Capital Assessee, a manufacturer of aluminium die-casting and auto components, faced multiple additions by AO, which were mostly confirmed by NFAC/CIT(A). Assessee filed two appeals before ITAT. The appeal for AY 2020-21 was late by 445 days, but ITAT condoned the delay after finding genuine and reasonable cause. Since the issues in both years were common, ITAT passed a consolidated order. Issue 1 – Foreign Investment Written Off (₹97.61 lakh in AY 2018-1...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930