Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bhawna Puri Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh)
Related Assessment Year : 2017-18
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Bhawna Puri Vs ITO (ITAT Chandigarh) Demonetisation Cash Deposits – ITAT Recognises Agricultural Reality, Sustains Only ₹10 Lakh Out of ₹36.16 Lakh Addition Assessee declared income of ₹5.21 lakh & agricultural income of ₹5.50 lakh. During demonetisation, she deposited ₹47.89 lakh in cash in her bank accounts. AO accepted ₹11,73,028 as explained (gifts, agricultural income, tuition/household receipts) but treated the balance ₹36,16,472 as unexplained u/s 68, & CIT(A) confirmed the addition. Assessee argued that she & her family jointly owned an apple orchard leased ...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Section 68 Additions Fail: Documentary Evidence Cannot Be Ignored Without Enquiry Commission Disallowance Remanded – 133(6) Non-Response Not Sufficient; Ad-hoc Expenses Cut to 10% Stamp Duty vs Actual Value Dispute: ITAT Orders DVO Valuation ITAT Bangalore Remands ₹49L Sec 68 Addition & ₹3.74L TDS Disallowance for Fresh Verification Penalty U/s 272A(1)(d) Deleted: Reasonable Cause Subsequent Compliance Accepted View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930