Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Chinar Gems Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2010-11
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Chinar Gems Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai) Bogus Purchase addition restricted to profit element -Kanak Impex Ruling distinguished : ITAT Mumbai In a consolidated ruling for AYs 2010-11 & 2011-12, Mumbai ITAT dismissed cross-appeals by Chinar Gems & the Revenue over additions on alleged bogus diamond purchases from Daksh Diamonds, part of the Bhanwarlal Jain accommodation entry network. AO, relying on Investigation Wing findings & statements from the Jain group, treated the entire purchases of ₹84.23 lakh (AY 2010-11) as bogus u/s 69C. Assessee had furnished bills, bank payments, confirma...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Tenancy Rights Transfer Taxable Only on Possession: STCG Addition Deleted JDA May Trigger Transfer- But No Double Taxation Allowed: Karnataka HC Relief CIT(A) Enhancement Quashed for No Notice – ITAT Restores LTCG Issues to AO No Penalty When Quantum Deleted: 270A Cannot Survive Without Addition Heavy Contract Payments by Trust Under Scanner: Matter Remanded for Verification View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930