Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mohit Bharatiya Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2011-12
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Mohit Bharatiya Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) ITAT Mumbai Deletes Entire ₹14.5 Cr Loan Additions -Revenue Loses in Section 68 Dispute- Once Assessee Provides PAN, Bank & ITR of Lenders, Onus Shifts to Revenue The case involved cross appeals – the assessee challenging additions sustained, & the Revenue challenging relief granted by CIT(A), in respect of various unsecured loans assessed u/s 68. AO had reopened assessment based on suspicious transaction reports from Saraswat Bank, & made additions aggregating ₹14.51 crore on account of loans/credits from six parties – Anoop Saxena (â‚...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Pune ITAT: Housing Society Wins U/s 80P Deduction on Interest from Cooperative Banks No Double Taxation on Liability Write-Back: Delhi ITAT Deletes Section 41(1) Addition and Notional Interest Demand Copy-Paste Reasons Sink Reassessment: Delhi ITAT Quashes Reopening for Non-Application of Mind No 14A Disallowance Without Satisfaction, No Penalty on Debatable Issues Section 54 Relief Cannot Be Denied If Capital Gains Are Invested Before Filing Return u/s 139(4): Bangalore ITAT View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930