Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Domet Trading Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2008-09
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Domet Trading Private Limited Vs DCIT (ITAT Mumbai) Corrigendum Cannot Cure Time-Bar: ITAT Mumbai Quashes 147 Reopening as No Valid 148 Notice Issued Before 31.03.2015 Assessee, Domet Trading Pvt. Ltd., filed return for AY 2008-09 declaring ₹13.98 lakh. Based on information alleging accommodation entries, AO issued a notice u/s 148 dated 23.02.2015; however, the notice mentioned AY 2009-10 instead of AY 2008-09. AO attempted to correct this by issuing a corrigendum only on 07.04.2015, after the statutory limitation of 31.03.2015 for issuing a valid 148 notice for AY 2008-09. Assessment was c...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC Slams Casual Sanction of ₹8 Cr Loan After Borrower Defaults From Day One Inheritance Isn’t a Birthright When a Valid Will Exists: SC Interest on Bank Deposits Can Still Qualify for 80P Deduction- Bangalore ITAT Gives Relief to Credit Co-operative Society SC: Interest on Borrowed Funds Allowed Even for Investment Through Group Concerns – Commercial Expediency Prevails Penalty for Unsecured Loans Not Automatic Merely for Section 68 Addition: ITAT Bangalore View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031