This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Jurisdiction under Article 226 not exercise due to non-existence of exceptional circumstance: Bail rejected
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- E. Ishitha Vs Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Karnataka High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Karnataka High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
E. Ishitha Vs Assistant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Karnataka High Court)
Karnataka High Court held that jurisdiction under Article 226 read with section 482 of Cr.P.C. is exercisable only in exceptional circumstances. Thus, interim bail stands rejected since present matter cannot be termed as exceptional.
Facts- This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioners/daughter and wife of one Sri E.Prathap are at the doors of this Court calling in question the grounds of arrest dated 03-01-2026 and seeking a declaration that the arres...
Author Info
