Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Shefali Bansa Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2013-14
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Shefali Bansa Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) The assessees’ appeals against search assessments under section 153A/143(3) for AYs 2013-14 and 2014-15 were not examined on merits because of a supervening insolvency development. As noted from the NCLT order dated 08.01.2026 (referred to on page 3 of the Tribunal order), insolvency proceedings were admitted against the assessees in their capacity as personal guarantors, and a statutory moratorium of 180 days was imposed. During this moratorium, all legal proceedings in respect of debts against the applicants stand stayed and creditors are barred from init...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penny Stock Addition Fails: ITAT Says Suspicion Cannot Replace Evidence Borrowed Satisfaction: ITAT Quashes Penny Stock Additions in Multiple Family Cases Statement Alone Cannot Justify ‘On-Money’ Addition: ITAT Mumbai Genuine ITR Mistake Cannot Lead to Tax on Wrong Income: ITAT Mumbai AO Cannot Reopen on the Same Material Examined in U/s 153C Assessment: ITAT Quashes ₹2.90 Crore Addition View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
June 2026
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930