This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Unsecured Loans Through Banking Channels Accepted; Section 68 Addition of ₹2.87 Cr Deleted
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- ACIT Vs Singhania Alu Foil Containers Manufacturing Company (ITAT Delhi)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Related Assessment Year
- 2015-16
- Courts
- All ITAT, ITAT Delhi
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Advertisement
ACIT Vs Singhania Alu Foil Containers Manufacturing Company (ITAT Delhi)
The Assessing Officer had added ₹2.87 crore under section 68 treating unsecured loans from three parties as unexplained cash credits. The CIT(A), after calling for a remand report and examining confirmations, PAN details, bank statements of lenders and the assessee, and evidence of repayment through banking channels, deleted the addition holding that identity, creditworthiness and genuineness stood proved.
Before the Tribunal, the Revenue contended that the CIT(A) wrongly admitted additional evidence an...
Author Info
