Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Chandra Prakash Vashistha Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur)
Related Assessment Year : 2021-22
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Chandra Prakash Vashistha Vs ITO (ITAT Jaipur) ITAT Jaipur Allows Leave Encashment Exemption-CBDT Notification 31/2023 Enhancing Limit to ₹25 Lakh Held Retrospective; Retired Bank Employee Entitled to ₹25 Lakh Leave Encashment Exemption; CBDT’s ₹25 Lakh Leave Encashment Limit Applies Retrospectively; Non-Government Retirees Can Claim ₹25 Lakh Leave Encashment Exemption ITAT Jaipur Allows Leave Encashment Exemption-CBDT Notification 31/2023 Enhancing Limit to ₹25 Lakh Held Retrospective- Delay of 959 Days Condoned; Tribunal Grants Benefit of Enhanced Leave Encashment Limit – B...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Excess Stock in Survey = Business Income, Not 115BBE Hit – ITAT Pune Draws Clear Line No Specific Charge = No Penalty – ITAT Deletes 270A Penalty for Vague Notice Bonafide Claim Updated Return Can’t Kill Genuine Exemption – ITAT Allows Section 11 Relief Despite Delay Delay Condoned with Cost: ITAT Grants Fresh Chance, Slams Non-Compliance Section 153C Valid but Addition Fails: No Incriminating Material = No Deemed Dividend View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

One Comment

Cancel reply

Leave a Comment to cavkshetty

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
May 2026
M T W T F S S
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031