Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Jagdish Chand Verma Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Jagdish Chand Verma Vs ITO (ITAT Mumbai)

ITAT Delhi Allows Section 54 for Property Purchased in Australia & Bank passbook is not books of accounts , a pre-condition to make addition u/s 68

In this case, Assessee, a 70-year-old retired bank employee who shifted to Australia in 2013, sold his Delhi flat for ₹70 lakh & earned LTCG of ₹54,35,000. He deposited ₹40,51,000 in his bank account from sale of household items & cash belonging to his spouse & son. Assessment was completed ex-parte u/s 144 with two additions: denial of exempt

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Penalty Deleted After ITAT Quashes Quantum Addition Invalid Notice, Wrong Remand Report & PAN Errors: ITAT Orders Fresh Assessment Seized Papers Showing Cash Payment Treated as Credible Evidence ITAT Clarifies: Working Capital Adjustment May Nullify Interest Addition Disallowance Invalid as Negative Capital Stemmed from Non-Cash Adjustment View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
December 2025
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031