Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Pamela Bhardwaj Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi)
Related Assessment Year : 2014-15
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Pamela Bhardwaj Vs ITO (ITAT Delhi) Attempt to Extend Assessment Time Through Section 148 Fails- Reassessment Without Expiry of 143(2) Window Held Invalid by ITAT Assessee had filed a return declaring ₹1.96 lakh income & ₹2 lakh agricultural income, which was accepted originally. Subsequently, reassessment proceedings  u/s 147 were initiated citing unexplained cash deposits of ₹25.5 lakhs & property purchase worth ₹1.14 crore. The reassessment concluded by accepting the original return without making additions. PCIT later invoked Sec 263, terming the reassessment order as erro...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Author Bio

CA Vijayakumar Shetty qualified in 1994 and in practice since then. Founding partner of Shetty & Co. He is a graduate from St Aloysius College, Mangalore . View Full Profile

My Published Posts

Interest on Delayed Sales Tax, Service Tax & PF Payments Deductible; TDS Interest Disallowed: Patna ITAT Section 54F Deduction Allowed on Genuine House Purchase from In-Laws: Mumbai ITAT Pune ITAT Quashes Reassessment as Section 148A(b) & 148A(d) Reasons Differed Section 54 Relief Can’t Be Denied Merely Due to Section 50C Addition: Pune ITAT Delhi ITAT Deletes Penny Stock Addition; Suspicion Can’t Replace Evidence View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Post by Date
July 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031